Integration Phase

At this level the field is firing on all cylinders, they are focused on identifying STYK hazards and controlling them, in real time.

What’s going well: 
Your organization has established a strong focus on identifying and controlling STKY hazards in real time. The next step is to strengthen the systems that support SIF prevention by ensuring high-quality execution of core safety activities, accurately classifying events using the SCL model, and evaluating work groups with HECA. By leveraging the CSRA scorecards and research-based processes, your organization can continue to build on the foundation for meaningful measurement, organizational learning, and the use of alternative metrics.

What to do next: 
Review all the components of the Integration Phase. Take some time to review each component, are you happy with where your organization is? Should your team revisit anything? If not, pick up on the most relevant topic and continue your journey.

Integration Phase

Choose an activity to learn more.

A peer-reviewed study that identifies and ranks the leading predictors of serious injuries and fatalities in construction, drawing on 254 potential factors generated by an expert panel of 22 practitioners. It delivers a prioritized list of SIF precursors that can be tested and deployed on site.

Go to SIF Precursors

A guide to running pre-job safety meetings that actually anticipate and prevent hazards. Covers what to discuss, who should lead, and how to make these brief conversations a cornerstone of the safety program.

Go to High Quality PJSB

Sets the standard for what a high-quality safety observation looks like: how to tour a site, engage workers, and make recommendations that genuinely improve safety rather than simply audit for compliance.

Go to High Quality Safety Observations

A field guide for leaders on what to do before, during, and after an engagement with frontline workers. Practical guidance for communicating values, listening actively, and strengthening safety culture.

Go to High Quality Leadership Engagements

Presents the Safety Classification and Learning (SCL) Model, a structured way to define and classify serious injuries and fatalities so organizations can learn from these rare events more effectively. It aims to replace scattered, 'whack-a-mole' investigation with consistent classification.

Go to Safety Classification and Learning (SCL) Model

Proposes High-Energy Control Assessments (HECA) as a standardized, objective alternative to TRIR for measuring safety performance, based on whether effective controls are in place for high-energy hazards. It offers a comparable metric that reflects real exposure to serious risk.

Go to High-Energy Control Assessment

A field-ready guide to spotting 'safety clutter,' the activities that consume time and attention without improving safety, using definitions, probing questions, examples, and countermeasures for each type. Designed for use during safety walks, reviews, and planning.

Go to A Guide to Decluttering Safety

The full research report behind the decluttering model, developed with 28 safety professionals and field experiments at eleven sites, presenting a diagnostic approach to identify, classify, and remove safety clutter.

Go to Decluttering Safety Report

The taxonomy at the heart of decluttering safety, classifying clutter into families and types, each with a definition, real field examples, and a countermeasure, so teams can name and remove what isn't adding value.

Go to Safety Clutter Classification (SCC) Model
Go to the Measurement & Learning Phase.